When N-gram Dedup Fails: How Much Paraphrasing Hides a Benchmark Leak
A controlled leak-detection test: word n-gram overlap catches every copy-pasted benchmark duplicate but only 25-47% of synonym-paraphrased ones.
A controlled leak-detection test: word n-gram overlap catches every copy-pasted benchmark duplicate but only 25-47% of synonym-paraphrased ones.
A minimal least-squares experiment reproduces double descent: test error peaks near the interpolation threshold, then drops 28x as parameters keep growing.
A 500-run simulation shows recursive synthetic training can shrink variance by up to 81% in 40 generations; mixing in 10% real data cuts that to under 2%.